Illustrative deliverable

See what a tender health check finds.

A realistic worked example showing how GroundsCost turns a tender pack into clear operational questions and commercial decisions.

Illustrative example: Northfield Grounds Contract is fictional. The quantities, names and findings are designed to demonstrate the structure of a GroundsCost review and are not a client case study.
GroundsCost commercial health check · GC-SAMPLE-01

Northfield Grounds Contract 2027–30

Initial review of the specification, site schedule, pricing workbook and draft conditions.

Proceed only after clarification
Download the PDF example
Advertised value£420,000
Initial term3 years
Sites listed46

Executive assessment

The opportunity appears operationally deliverable for a contractor with two established mobile crews, but the pack does not currently support a defensible fixed price. Grass quantities conflict across three documents, shrub-bed frequencies are incomplete, and the TUPE schedule is referenced but not supplied.

The buyer should be asked to issue a reconciled quantity schedule and confirm the pricing treatment of reactive tree work. A bid can continue in parallel, but the current model should retain explicit provisional assumptions.

Priority findings

HIGH
Grass area differs by 18%

Appendix B totals 612,400 m²; the pricing workbook totals 501,900 m². At the stated frequencies this difference materially changes annual mowing hours.

HIGH
TUPE data missing

The conditions state that employee transfer information is available through the portal, but no schedule is present in the downloaded pack.

MEDIUM
Reactive arboriculture has no pricing mechanism

Emergency call-outs and make-safe work are required, but the schedule contains neither rates nor a provisional sum.

MEDIUM
Leaf clearance output is open-ended

The specification requires sites to remain clear without defining visits, priority zones or disposal arrangements.

Recommended clarification questions

  1. Please confirm the authoritative grass area and reissue a reconciled site schedule.
  2. Please provide the anonymised employee liability information referenced in clause 12.
  3. How should reactive and emergency tree works be priced and authorised?
  4. Does the contractor carry disposal cost for leaves, green waste and fly-tipped material?
  5. Which index and review date apply to price adjustment after year one?
What you receive

A decision, not a mysterious number.

Scope reconciliation

Conflicting documents, missing quantities and unclear responsibilities identified.

Risk and assumptions

Commercial issues ranked with specific clarification questions.

Next-step recommendation

Proceed, proceed conditionally, or stop before more estimating time is spent.